Smart Grid Environment
Under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has “primary responsibility to coordinate development of a framework that includes protocols and model standards for information management to achieve interoperability of smart grid devices and systems…”1. Furthermore, NIST2 defines the term Smart Grid as:
“a modernization of the electricity delivery system so it monitors, protects and automatically optimizes the operation of its interconnected elements — from the central and distributed generator through the high-voltage transmission network and the distribution system, to industrial users and building automation systems, to energy storage installations and to end-use consumers and their thermostats, electric vehicles, appliances and other household devices.”
In this context, “thermostats, electric vehicles, appliances and other household devices” may be considered “utilization equipment.” The NIST Smart Grid Collaboration Site3 lists a wide range of energy management applications and electrical service provider interactions, including:
A Smart Grid Conceptual Model may be portrayed as a set of diagrams and descriptions that are the basis of discussing the characteristics, uses, behavior, interfaces, requirements and standards of the Smart Grid. This conceptual model, shown in figure 1, provides a context for analysis of inter-operation and standards for the development of the Smart Grid architecture.
Within this model, customers are defined as the end users of electricity; they may also generate, store, and manage the use of energy. Traditionally, three types of customers are identified, each with their own domain: residential (home), commercial (building/commercial), and industrial. In addition, the end user may be an institutional customer (such as schools, hospitals, etc.). This project focused on the end user, or customer, in the built environment as shown in figure 2.
The implementation of the Smart Grid changes the nature of the electrical distribution system in ways that have a number of different safety implications, including personnel safety, electrical safety, and fire safety. Because of these safety implications, it is important that relevant safety codes and standards, such as the National Electrical Code, stay abreast of Smart Grid developments.
Before the Smart Grid, electrical power distribution to customers was largely a one-way process, with customers receiving electrical power generated at a bulk generation plant which was then transmitted and distributed via the existing grid. Under this scheme, a limited amount of instrumentation data could be transmitted from a customer to the service provider and, in some instances, remote control could be executed.
Under the Smart Grid, electrical power generation and distribution become a two-way process between the customer and the grid. To work effectively and safely, the processes of power generation and distribution, as well as those of instrumentation and control, must be closely coordinated and managed.
Smart Grid Technologies
Current and emerging Smart Grid technologies were reviewed and the implications that these technologies may have upon the built environment (such as a facility’s safety features) were assessed wherever the National Electrical Code (NEC) has jurisdiction. This included all power distribution and control systems throughout a facility. Specific areas of focus were:
- energy generation and microgeneration systems (such as photovoltaic cells, wind power, micro hydro, emergency and standby generators, and fuel cells);
- plug-in vehicles;
- community energy storage.
Customers who adopt smart grid technology gain control over the amount and time of electrical load consumption. For residential customers, the smart meter will generally be installed by the utility or service provider, and the customer may acquire additional devices/systems to take advantage of the information and communication provided by the meter. For example, if these customers switch to a time of use pricing system, they can benefit by shifting nontime-specific loads to cheaper times, optimizing micro-generation systems for maximum output at high price times, and using on-site storage to supply the grid or the home at high price times. The commercial customer may acquire additional devices/systems to take advantage of the information and communication provided by the meter. Many commercial customers have already taken advantage of a time of use pricing system, in which they perform non-critical operations at times when that rate structure favors a lower rate. For example, a commercial customer may produce ice during the night to use during the day for a chilled water system.
Review of NFPA 70
Based upon an assessment of current and emerging smart grid technologies, a review of the NEC was conducted and NEC sections were identified as candidates for revision. Some of these code sections may require revisions to address Smart Grid monitoring or control, (such as Chapter 4, Equipment, and Chapter 6, Special Equipment), while other code sections may require revisions due to utility interfaces (Chapter 1, General, and Chapter 2, Wiring and Protection), emergency power (Chapter 7, Special Conditions), or wired/wireless communication (Chapter 8, Communication Systems).
Portions of this report are reproduced with permission from the National Electrical Code,® NFPA 70® – 2011, NFPA 110, Emergency and Standby Power Systems, and NFPA 111, Stored Electrical Energy Emergency and Standby Power Systems, all of which are Copyright © 2010 National Fire Protection Association. This material is not the complete and official position of the NFPA on the reference subject which is represented solely by the standard in its entirety.
This work was made possible by the Fire Protection Research Foundation (an affiliate of the National Fire Protection Association). The authors are indebted to the project steering committee members, smart grid task group members, and industry representatives for their valuable suggestions.
1 Report to NIST on the Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), August 10, 2009
3 http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP17FacilitySmartGridInformationStandard accessed November 14th, 2010
4 Report to NIST on the Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), August 10, 2009
In 2009 the NFPA was invited to participate in the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) Smart Grid Rapid Standardization Initiative to ensure that the safety of the built infrastructure was appropriately addressed. This was a proactive initiative to ensure that the NEC and other NFPA electrical safety standards kept pace with smart grid developments. A NFPA Smart Grid Task Force was formed and a grant request submitted to NIST for focused support of task force activity. This included accelerating interoperable codes and standards development for the smart grid. The grant request was approved in the summer of 2010.
Project research objectives included:
The project has received broad support from the fire protection community. The project steering committee consists of members representing the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., International Association of Electrical Inspectors, International Fire Marshals Association, NEC Correlating Committee, Schneider Electric Company, NIST, National Fire Protection Association, and CSA-International.
A two-day industry workshop was conducted in mid-March in Washington, DC, to review the preliminary results and solicit input from leaders within the NFPA safety standards development community on the project. The NEC Smart Grid Task Force also provided comments in consideration of upcoming NEC code change cycle.
About the Authors
Lonny Simonian, P.E., Associate Professor (email@example.com)
Lonny Simonian is a registered professional electrical engineer in the state of California and holds a MS in engineering from UC Berkeley and a BS in electrical engineering from Cal Poly. He has over 25 years of electrical engineering experience in the design and construction industry and is a member of the NFPA, IEEE, Project Management Institute, and Construction Management Association of America.
Dr. Thomas M. Korman, P.E., Associate Professor (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Dr. Korman holds a doctorate and masters from Stanford University. He is registered professional engineer in state of California. He is member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) and is a Safety Assessment Evaluator and Coordinator for the California Emergency Management Agency.
Frederick W. Mowrer, Ph.D., Professor-in-Residence / Director (email@example.com)
Frederick W. Mowrer is currently the director and professor-in-residence of Fire Protection Engineering programs at Cal Poly. He retired with emeritus status from the Department of Fire Protection Engineering at the University of Maryland, where he served on the faculty for 21 years. Dr. Mowrer is a fellow and a past-president of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers. He also maintains a consulting practice specializing in fire protection and fire science applications.
David Conrad Phillips, Graduate Student (firstname.lastname@example.org)
David Phillips holds a B.S. in materials engineering from Cal Poly where he is currently pursuing a master’s degree in fire protection engineering.